I'm curious why you regard the appointment of Durham as an abuse of the justice system and describe the indictment of Sussman as based on a flimsy excuse. I think the American public benefits from seeing the contra-evidence long-known by the FBI and SCO but which Mueller elected not to actually report on. The Mueller report systematically described every trivial Russian contact with the Trump organization, but chose instead simply to decline to report on facets of the claims they had disproven. That's a record that needs correcting.
Also, collecting information and preparing a report you know to be misleading and providing it to the FBI to instigate an investigation that you then intend to leak to the press seems like a much more appropriate case to charge a 1001 than the palpably flimsy 1001 charge against Papadop.
I'm curious why you regard the appointment of Durham as an abuse of the justice system and describe the indictment of Sussman as based on a flimsy excuse. I think the American public benefits from seeing the contra-evidence long-known by the FBI and SCO but which Mueller elected not to actually report on. The Mueller report systematically described every trivial Russian contact with the Trump organization, but chose instead simply to decline to report on facets of the claims they had disproven. That's a record that needs correcting.
Also, collecting information and preparing a report you know to be misleading and providing it to the FBI to instigate an investigation that you then intend to leak to the press seems like a much more appropriate case to charge a 1001 than the palpably flimsy 1001 charge against Papadop.
What explanation can *you* give for the contacts of Alfa with Cendyn/Listrak, then?
What about the Dossier has been confirmed beyond basic biographical info or facts widely reported in the press. Nothing, to my knowledge.