FWIW geolocation data provided by Google, and perhaps other sources, often includes “GPS” derived geolocations. Google reports those locations as accurate to 2 to 16 meters, i.e., 6.2 to 50 feet. However visits to an area are determined by indentifying geolocations inside a geofence. That fence is almost always larger than the area of interest to ensure that all potential visitors are counted, at the expense of falsely counting some non visitors. For the specific case of True the Vote, a geofence with a radius of 100 feet was used.
True the Vote had no involvement in provoking the Yuma investigation or the guilty plea.
-----
The investigation into ballot harvesting in Yuma in the Primary Election began in Aug 2020, before True the Vote had any data.
The indictment occurred in Dec 2020, before True the Vote purchased their video and geotracking data.
It was not True the Vote that recorded the Video
It was Gary Snyder and David Lara (Snyder is a politician in Yuma) who recorded the T-shirt table across from the drop box in Aug 2020 and Lara then reported the alleged ballot harvesting to Pouquette, the County Recorder, who notified the sheriff.
True the Vote/D'Souza had no involvement in the indictments other than being allowed to use a few seconds of video of the T-shirt table in the movie.
Fingerprints?
Fingerprints had nothing to do with the Yuma indictments. The sheriff tried to get fingerprints from ballots by using the services of an FBI lab, but the results were inconclusive, so Phillips' statement about the FBI busting mules with fingerprints is wrong.
Also, the "mule" with one glove at the Gwinnett drop box (a man) had the glove on the hand holding the slot, not holding the ballot, so he was not trying to hide his fingerprints from being on the ballot as Phillips claimed.
Guilty Plea
The guilty plea was negotiated and announced on the AZ Attorney General's site before 2000 Mules came out (Fuentes' court date was later, but the plea was arranged and announced earlier in the year).
2000 Mules had nothing to do with the Yuma indictments or the guilty plea. True the Vote tried to take credit for something that was done by Snyder, Lara, Pouquette, the Sheriff's office, and the AG's office without True the Vote's involvement.
A timeline shows True the Vote's claims about the Yuma investigation to be untrue.
Great work here, Rob, as usual.
FWIW geolocation data provided by Google, and perhaps other sources, often includes “GPS” derived geolocations. Google reports those locations as accurate to 2 to 16 meters, i.e., 6.2 to 50 feet. However visits to an area are determined by indentifying geolocations inside a geofence. That fence is almost always larger than the area of interest to ensure that all potential visitors are counted, at the expense of falsely counting some non visitors. For the specific case of True the Vote, a geofence with a radius of 100 feet was used.
This is an unbelievable list of excuses bobby! Try reading this article.
https://thewashingtonstandard.com/2000-mules-vindication-first-person-to-plead-guilty-to-voter-fraud-conspiracy-in-2020-election/
Lasso, the article you linked is incorrect.
True the Vote had no involvement in provoking the Yuma investigation or the guilty plea.
-----
The investigation into ballot harvesting in Yuma in the Primary Election began in Aug 2020, before True the Vote had any data.
The indictment occurred in Dec 2020, before True the Vote purchased their video and geotracking data.
It was not True the Vote that recorded the Video
It was Gary Snyder and David Lara (Snyder is a politician in Yuma) who recorded the T-shirt table across from the drop box in Aug 2020 and Lara then reported the alleged ballot harvesting to Pouquette, the County Recorder, who notified the sheriff.
True the Vote/D'Souza had no involvement in the indictments other than being allowed to use a few seconds of video of the T-shirt table in the movie.
Fingerprints?
Fingerprints had nothing to do with the Yuma indictments. The sheriff tried to get fingerprints from ballots by using the services of an FBI lab, but the results were inconclusive, so Phillips' statement about the FBI busting mules with fingerprints is wrong.
Also, the "mule" with one glove at the Gwinnett drop box (a man) had the glove on the hand holding the slot, not holding the ballot, so he was not trying to hide his fingerprints from being on the ballot as Phillips claimed.
Guilty Plea
The guilty plea was negotiated and announced on the AZ Attorney General's site before 2000 Mules came out (Fuentes' court date was later, but the plea was arranged and announced earlier in the year).
2000 Mules had nothing to do with the Yuma indictments or the guilty plea. True the Vote tried to take credit for something that was done by Snyder, Lara, Pouquette, the Sheriff's office, and the AG's office without True the Vote's involvement.
A timeline shows True the Vote's claims about the Yuma investigation to be untrue.