Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Larry Seltzer's avatar

I'm mostly on-board with your interpretation. You say "[a]ll this was before Trump was elected in 2016 — they didn’t spy on the Trump White House." Item 6 in the document seems to say that it continued after 1/20/2017.

I'd also point out that earlier Durham filings indicated that Tech Executive-1 was hoping for a position in the Clinton administration, so even if he was uncompensated, he was hoping for compensation.

One more thing: IANAL, but it seems to me that TE-1 may have opened up Neustar to civil liability. I'd like to hear a real lawyer's opinion on that.

Expand full comment
Daniel's avatar

You know as well as I do finding the figure on the number of bullet ballots cast in the swing states isn't a monumental undertaking, as you make the it sound. The paltry figures and percentages you listed are inaccurate, they are much higher, and enough to make a difference.. But more importantly, you left out the fact that out of the numerous bullet ballots cast in each swing state over 90% were cast from within only a couple of the numerous countys in these states. Some of them have 80-100 countys. This pattern repeated in each of the swing states. A college mathematician figured the odds against this happening at 1 in 35 BILLION!

Expand full comment
6 more comments...

No posts